Il piccolo Hans - anno VI - n. 22 - aprile-giugno 1979

pragmatici ricordiamo principalmente B. Williams, La Certitude du Cogito (in La Philosophie Analytique, Parigi 1962, pp. 40-57); J. Hintikka, Cogito ergo sum: inference or performance (Philo­ sophical review, LXXI, 1962, pp. 3-32). Questo articolo è stato molto discusso: ofr. Von Leyden, Cogito ergo sum, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, XIII, 1962-1963; Weinberg, Cogito ergo sum: some reflections on Mr Hintikka's article, Ph. Review, 1962; Hintikka, Cogito ergo sum, as an Inference and a Performance, Ph. Review, 1963; Frankfurt, Descartes' Discussion of His Exi­ stence..., Ph. Review, 1966; Nakhnikian, On the logie of Cogito Proposition, - NoCts; Feldman, On the performatory interpretation of the cogito, Ph. Review, 1973, ecc.); e A.N. Prior, The Cogito . of Descartes and the Concept of Self-Confirmation (1965, ripreso in Papers in Logie and Ethics, pp. 165-175). E' in preparazione un volume di articoli su « la logica del Cogito», a cura di F. Nef e ·F. Récanati. 55 Sul « paradosso di Moore »: G.E. Moore, A reply to My Critics, in P .A. Schilpp, The Philosophy of G.E. Moore (La Salle, Illinois, 1942; 3' ed. 1968) pp. 541-543, e Russell's theory of de­ scriptions (1944, ripreso in Philosophical Papers, Londra 1959) pp. 175-176; JL Austin, The meaning of a word (1940, ripreso in Philosophical Papers) pp. 63-64, Performative Utterance (ibid.) p. 248 e How to do things vith words, pp. 48-52 [tr. it. cit., pp. 60-64]; A.M. Mac lver, Some questions about «Know» and « Think », A. Duncan-Jones, Further Questios about «Know» and « Think », e A.M. Mac Iver, Réply to Mr Duncan-Jones, que­ sti articoli pubblicati in Analysis (1938), e ripresi in M. Macdo­ nald (ed.), Phlosophy and Analysis (1954) pp. 88-108; Y. Bar-Hil­ lel, Analysis of «Correct » Language, Mind LV (1946) pp. 333- 337; C.H. Langford, The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy (in The Philosophy of G.E. Moore) pp. 332-333; Max Black, Saying and Disb,elieving (1952) ripreso in M. Macdonald, op. cit., pp. 109-119, e discusso in R. Willis, Prof. Black on « Saying and bt­ sbelieving » (Analysis, 1953) e K. Baier, Contradiction and Absur­ dity (Analysis, 1954); L. Wittgenstein, Phlosophical Investigations (Oxford 1953) [testo it., Ricerche filosofiche, cit.] II, 10; G.K. Grant, Pragmatic Implication, Philosophy, vol. XXXIII (1958) pp. 312-324; P.H. Nowell-Smith, Ethics (Blackwell 1957) pp. 71- 75 [tr. it., ·Etica, Firenze, La Nuova Italia, 1974, pp. 83-87] e Contextual lmplication and Ethical Theory (Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. XXXVI, 1962, pp. 3-10); J. Hin­ tikka, Knowledge and Belief (Ithaca 1962) pp. 64-102; M.F. Bur­ nyeat, Belief in Speech, Proceedings of Aristotelian Society, vol. LXVIII (1967-68) pp. 229-234; A.N. Prior, Objects of Thought (Oxford 1971) pp. 81-84; B. Williams, Problems of the Self (Cam­ bridge 1973) pp. 136-137, ecc. 140